Skip to main content

CEO Pay on the Rise (Again)

A report released today has found that the average pay for FTSE 100 directors increased by 49% in the past year.  This is at a time when the average real pay of most citizens has decreased by close to 5% and the returns on the FTSE 100 have been negative!  Is this not more evidence (if it was needed) of growing wealth inequality in our society? 

There are many economists who suggest that high pay incentivizes directors and solves what is known as the agency problem.  However, high pay appears to be more due to managerial opportunism. 

What needs to happen to reform CEO pay?  First, stock options as a form of compensation have to go.  Second, my work with Gareth Campbell (click here) suggests that directorial share qualifications, which were common until the early twentieth century, should be re-introduced as managers face a downside to their bad decision-making.  Third, golden parachutes need to be removed - why should executives be rewarded for bad performance?  Fourth, the practice of distributing cash via stock repurchases needs to be made illegal (as it once was) as this method of returning cash to shareholders creates all sort of malincentives and means that directors do not face the discipline of having to return cash to shareholders in a regular and systematic manner (i.e., dividends).

Popular posts from this blog

Bitcoin Bubble?

According to Robert Shiller , speaking at Davos, Bitcoin is a perfect example of a bubble - story here . Shiller sees Bitcoin as a backwards step in the evolution of money.   George Selgin , a free banker, takes an opposing view - click here .  Although he doesn't believe that Bitcoin is money, he sees its development as a fascinating turn in the evolution of money. In particular, he lauds the fact that Bitcoin production is constrained and cannot be infinite. There is a short video below where Bitcoin explain how it works.

How Valuable Are Connections?

Daron Acemoglu, Simon Johnson, Amir Kermani, James Kwak and Todd Mitton have written a paper on whether firms connected to Timothy Geithner benefited from these connections. They do so by looking at how stocks of these firms reacted to the announcement that he was a nominee for Treasury Secretary in November 2008. They find that there were large abnormal returns for connected firms. Below is the paper's abstract and the full paper is available here . The announcement of Timothy Geithner as nominee for Treasury Secretary in November 2008 produced a cumulative abnormal return for financial firms with which he had a connection. This return was about 6% after the first full day of trading and about 12% after ten trading days. There were subsequently abnormal negative returns for connected firms when news broke that Geithner's confirmation might be derailed by tax issues. Excess returns for connected firms may reflect the perceived impact of relying on the advice of a small ne

Boom and Bust: A Global History of Financial Bubbles

Boom and Bust: A Global History of Financial Bubbles, co-authored with my colleague Will Quinn , is forthcoming in August. It is published by Cambridge University Press and is available for pre-order at Amazon , Barnes and Noble , Waterstones and Cambridge University Press .