Skip to main content

The Squeezed Middle

The Institute for Fiscal Studies has forecasted huge declines in living standards over the next couple of years - they reckon that median incomes will fall by about 7% in real terms (click here).  Although, the phenomenon of the squeezed middle has been recognised by sociologists and economists for a long time, the recent crisis has exacerbated the situation for the middle classes in the UK (and other economies).  First, the value of the main asset of the middle classes (their homes) has collapsed, with the result that many are in negative equity.  Second, middle classes savings have been hit by negative real interests.  Third, they have taken large real pay cuts.  Fourth, the value of their pension has been eroded.  Fifth, universal child benefits are set to disappear and university tuition fees have trebled.  I could go on....

Recent work on long-run income and wealth inequality shows that Western society has become more unequal since the 1970s- see, for example, my own work on Irish wealth inequality over the long run.  In addition, work on tax regimes by Piketty and Saez clearly shows that they have become substantially less progressive since the 1970s.

These trends raise lots of interesting questions for social scientists.  Why and when did the middle class emerge?  Is the middle class necessary for the functioning of democracy?  Will the middle classes in the West disappear?  What is the future for the middle classes of the developing world? (click here for an article on the middle classes in developing economies).  

Popular posts from this blog

Bitcoin Bubble?

According to Robert Shiller , speaking at Davos, Bitcoin is a perfect example of a bubble - story here . Shiller sees Bitcoin as a backwards step in the evolution of money.   George Selgin , a free banker, takes an opposing view - click here .  Although he doesn't believe that Bitcoin is money, he sees its development as a fascinating turn in the evolution of money. In particular, he lauds the fact that Bitcoin production is constrained and cannot be infinite. There is a short video below where Bitcoin explain how it works.

How Valuable Are Connections?

Daron Acemoglu, Simon Johnson, Amir Kermani, James Kwak and Todd Mitton have written a paper on whether firms connected to Timothy Geithner benefited from these connections. They do so by looking at how stocks of these firms reacted to the announcement that he was a nominee for Treasury Secretary in November 2008. They find that there were large abnormal returns for connected firms. Below is the paper's abstract and the full paper is available here . The announcement of Timothy Geithner as nominee for Treasury Secretary in November 2008 produced a cumulative abnormal return for financial firms with which he had a connection. This return was about 6% after the first full day of trading and about 12% after ten trading days. There were subsequently abnormal negative returns for connected firms when news broke that Geithner's confirmation might be derailed by tax issues. Excess returns for connected firms may reflect the perceived impact of relying on the advice of a small ne

Boom and Bust: A Global History of Financial Bubbles

Boom and Bust: A Global History of Financial Bubbles, co-authored with my colleague Will Quinn , is forthcoming in August. It is published by Cambridge University Press and is available for pre-order at Amazon , Barnes and Noble , Waterstones and Cambridge University Press .